Every year, by the end of June, we organize a doctoral workshop in order to assess the progress of the PhD candidates. All the tudents participate. The workshop takes place in a very friendly environment in which both professors and students give their advices and feed-back to the candidates.
The PhD follow-up workshop of 2014 will take place in 25th, 26th and 27th of June, following the same format of last course.
All the graduate students enrolled in the PhD Program in Applied Economics must be reviewed each year to track the progress of their work, in the fulfillment of the UAB normative in reference to European Higher Education Area (EHEA) PhD programs.
The PhD academic board approves and announces each year the annual schedule of the follow-up sessions. The progress of each PhD student will be assessed by a specific committee composed of three members: two common members for all committees plus a third expert, who will be selected according to the research field of the thesis’s candidate.
The possible evaluation results are: “favorable”, “favorable with observations” and “not favorable”. A “favorable with observations” evaluation involves the requirement to the student to take into account the formulated remarks. In the report of the following year, the student must indicate how the required changes have been taken into account. A “non-favorable” assessment involves to be expelled from the PhD program.
Content of the research report
Both in the case of face or non-face assessments (in the case of the students subject to RD 778/1998), the research report presented by the student must have a common structure, composed of the next parts:
- A description of the objectives of the thesis, the degree of their achievement and the progress (during the current academic course) to meet these objectives. The working calendar and the projected calendar to complete the thesis must be delivered as well. Maximum space: 5 pages.
- A report of the academic activities (during the current academic course) including attended seminars and “lunch seminars”, congresses, seminars, courses, research visits, etc. Maximum space: 3 pages.
- Those students that obtained a qualification of “favorable with observations” in previous assessment have to deliver a new version of the paper revised according to the suggestions formulated by the evaluation committee jointly with a report explaining the changes incorporated into the paper.
- The paper submitted and to be presented to the workshop. Students not presenting to the workshop must provide a complete document detailing all the progress and objectives accomplished (or achieved) during the current academic year.
The presentation of papers will follow a workshop format. The presentations are open to the public and could be of two types:
- Short presentations of 30 minutes (25’ for presentation + 5’ for questions). Only for first year students.
- Regular presentations of 45 minutes (30’ for presentation + 10’ for discussant + 5’ minutes for questions). In this case, the PhD student must suggest the name of another student to act as discussant or, alternatively, must indicate the field of her/his work in order to have a discussant assigned.
The sessions are organized by topics and a faculty member will act as chairman.
We need the PhD students to communicate (email to firstname.lastname@example.org) the title of the paper to be presented, jointly with an abstract of no more than 100 words and the name of the proposed discussant non later that the 19th of May.
The deadline for submitting the rest of the documentation is the Wednesday 11th of June.
The evaluation committee will elaborate the reports that will be send to PhD students before the third week of September.
In order to allow a proper planning of the attendance to the workshop sessions, we inform that the 2014 sessions will be organized:
- From 25th to 27th of June.